![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
wendyzskiWhen I got back this afternoon, I found the decision fron IDES in my mailbox.
FINDINGS OF FACT: The claimant worked as an Administrative Assistant from 4/19/04 until 7/12/04. On or shortly before 7/2/04, the employer learned that the claimant was seeking other emloyment. The claimant had previously been placed on probation, and was concerned that she might be discharged. After learning trhe claimant had started looking for other work, the employer placed a help wanted ad in the newspaper. On 7/12/04, the claimant called off work ill. The claimant was later informed that she had been replaced.
CONCLUSION:...The claimant did not willfully or deliberately violate any policy of the employer. It is concluded that the claimant's discharge was more of a business decision on the part of the employer than anything else, and that misconduct has not been established. Therefore, the claimant is not disqualified from benefits under section 602A of the Act.
DECISION: The determination of the Local Office is SET ASIDE. No disqualification is imposed under section 602A of the Act. Section 601A of the act is not applicable hereto.
So, I will have a Biiiig check (about $1200) showing up in my mailbox within the week.
WHEW!
FINDINGS OF FACT: The claimant worked as an Administrative Assistant from 4/19/04 until 7/12/04. On or shortly before 7/2/04, the employer learned that the claimant was seeking other emloyment. The claimant had previously been placed on probation, and was concerned that she might be discharged. After learning trhe claimant had started looking for other work, the employer placed a help wanted ad in the newspaper. On 7/12/04, the claimant called off work ill. The claimant was later informed that she had been replaced.
CONCLUSION:...The claimant did not willfully or deliberately violate any policy of the employer. It is concluded that the claimant's discharge was more of a business decision on the part of the employer than anything else, and that misconduct has not been established. Therefore, the claimant is not disqualified from benefits under section 602A of the Act.
DECISION: The determination of the Local Office is SET ASIDE. No disqualification is imposed under section 602A of the Act. Section 601A of the act is not applicable hereto.
So, I will have a Biiiig check (about $1200) showing up in my mailbox within the week.
WHEW!
